Infeld Red (Thomastik-Infeld)
Displayed for educational use only, please do not reuse.
|
What the manufacturer says:
|
Average
Neutral/Warm (Tone)
|
Neutral/Rich (Complexity)
|
Neutral/Loud (Projection)
|
Overall
|
Reviews
H. Wu (5/11/16)
Warm (Tone)
|
Rich (Complexity)
|
Neutral (Projection)
|
Overall
|
* Much warmer tone than the Titanium solo, but compromises on the projection, especially in mid register (lower portion of A string)
* The E string is sweet and its projection is comparable to Westmister E
* LOTS of overtones, especially the lower strings
* Takes about 3 days to break in
* Response is a bit on the slow side.
* The E string is sweet and its projection is comparable to Westmister E
* LOTS of overtones, especially the lower strings
* Takes about 3 days to break in
* Response is a bit on the slow side.
W. Farooqi (2/2/16)
Bright (Tone)
|
Neutral (Complexity)
|
Loud (Projection)
|
Overall
|
These strings did not work well for my violin at all. My instrument is darker, and these strings didn't help to bring out any of it's character at all. They also seem to eat away at the rosin in on my bow, and I would find it almost cake on the string. I felt the response was a little awkward from the strong. I could not play quietly, the sound would go from a raspy noise to mp with nothing in the middle. In addition, they were not comfortable to play with, maybe the gauge was too thin for my fingers?
I think I will be staying away from these for a bit.
I think I will be staying away from these for a bit.
R. McDonnell (3/30/14)
Warm (Tone)
|
Rich (Complexity)
|
Neutral (Projection)
|
Overall
|
As promised, these are very similar to dominants. Thomastik set out to improve the dominants with this string, but did not necessarily succeed. The tone is much darker and warmer than dominants, but not as balanced. They are a good string for orchestral playing due to this characteristic. Projection is average and tuning stability is good. The tension is a bit higher than dominants under the fingers, but not overly so. A decent choice for anyone looking for warm, dominant-like string.
A. Chander (3/26/14)
Neutral (Tone)
|
Rich (Complexity)
|
Loud (Projection)
|
Overall
|
I find these strings to provide a perfect tonal balance on my bright, sweet, complex sounding Italian instrument.
Despite being advertised as a really warm and rich string, I actually find them to be slightly more neutral in terms of darkness/brightness, but with plenty of focus and rich overtones that help the strings project. The strings have a great sustain and ring clear. There is an even transition from string to string, and the gold E is beautifully warm whilst still retaining projection. Some have found this string to whistle; I have not had this problem. It is a matter of adapting one's bowing technique to prevent this string from whistling, I believe.
These strings last a long time, though the gold E loses its plating after about 4 weeks due to finger oils. This does not affect the tone of the string, in my opinion. A Pirastro Gold Label E string is also a good tonal match for the set, but I prefer the original E. The A string can be prone to fraying on some instruments but again I have not had this issue.
Despite being advertised as a really warm and rich string, I actually find them to be slightly more neutral in terms of darkness/brightness, but with plenty of focus and rich overtones that help the strings project. The strings have a great sustain and ring clear. There is an even transition from string to string, and the gold E is beautifully warm whilst still retaining projection. Some have found this string to whistle; I have not had this problem. It is a matter of adapting one's bowing technique to prevent this string from whistling, I believe.
These strings last a long time, though the gold E loses its plating after about 4 weeks due to finger oils. This does not affect the tone of the string, in my opinion. A Pirastro Gold Label E string is also a good tonal match for the set, but I prefer the original E. The A string can be prone to fraying on some instruments but again I have not had this issue.
F. Rupert (1/15/14)
Neutral (Tone)
|
Clean (Complexity)
|
Neutral (Projection)
|
Overall
|
I tried Infeld Reds once and will not again. While I have found that Infeld Blues keep their good sound for quite a long time, the Reds do not. I put on a set for a four-day chamber music event last year, and by the end of the event they were getting dead. Total playing time was less than 40 hours. That's unacceptable. I will not buy them again, ever.
Thomastik-Infeld'sa other products are generally quite good, so I'm surprised.
Thomastik-Infeld'sa other products are generally quite good, so I'm surprised.
K. Dillon (5/15/13)
Warm (Tone)
|
Rich (Complexity)
|
Very Loud (Projection)
|
Overall
|
The strings sound very warm. They also resonate with other strings and ring a lot. The tension seems very high and leave black marks on finger after a long playing session. They are not the most responsive. The e-string whistles and is brighter than other strings, but is still balanced.
H. Jansberg (5/15/13)
Bright (Tone)
|
Neutral (Complexity)
|
Neutral (Projection)
|
Overall
|
I have tried the Infeld reds on a couple of instruments and although they are said to be warmer than the Infeld Blue I have actually found them to be brighter especially the A string.
S. Thompson (5/14/13)
Warm (Tone)
|
Neutral (Complexity)
|
Neutral (Projection)
|
Overall
|
When these came out they were plugged as Dominants, but warmer. I would completely agree. These almost are as dark as Obligato, but with less projection. I liked the sound they produced and would be great in an orchestra, but performing solos I needed something with a bit more projection.